(1) This procedure supports the Medals and Executive Dean’s Awards Policy and provides further details for awarding the Charles Sturt Medal, University Medals and the Executive Dean’s Awards. (2) This procedure applies to staff and students of Charles Sturt University (the University), including students enrolled in courses delivered in partnership with third parties. (3) Where supporting documents are referenced in this procedure, they will be listed in the associated information tab. (4) Most terms used in this procedure are defined in the glossary section of the Medals and Executive Dean’s Awards Policy. (5) This procedure supports the Medals and Executive Dean’s Awards Policy. (6) The executive dean (or their delegate) will invite their faculty’s recipients, or eligible recipients, of the Undergraduate, Postgraduate and Bachelor (Honours) University Medals for each calender year to nominate themselves for the Charles Sturt Medal. (7) Selection criteria and application guidelines for the Charles Sturt medal will be set by the Academic Senate and reviewed every two years. (8) Candidates will address the selection criteria and provide a statement outlining how they demonstrate a significant commitment to the public good. Faculties may provide support and advice to candidates in preparing their nominations. (9) When the nomination period for any recipients graduating at end of year ceremonies has closed, the executive deans (or delegates) will submit the nominations received by all eligible medal recipients in that year to the Academic Senate. (10) Academic Senate will assess the nominations based on the selection criteria and the nominee’s statements and award one Charles Sturt Medal for the year. Academic Senate is not required to award a Charles Sturt Medal if there are no suitable nominees. (11) The Student Administration will generate a report as required to identify students who meet the eligibility criteria for the Undergraduate and Postgraduate University Medals, as stated in the Medals and Executive Dean’s Awards Policy. (12) The executive dean (or delegate) will review the list of eligible students for their faculty and may decide to exclude any students that have a misconduct finding against them or for any other reason they determine necessary. Where a student is excluded for reasons other than misconduct, the reason for the exclusion must be reported to Academic Senate. (13) The executive dean (or delegate) will affirm the list of recipients and advise the Student Administration and Academic Senate of the results. (14) Each year, the Office of Governance and Corporate Affairs will invite faculties to identify anyone who has graduated or will graduate in the relevant calendar year and meets the eligibility criteria for the Bachelor (Honours) University Medals, as stated in the Medals and Executive Dean’s Awards Policy. (15) The executive dean (or delegate) will review the list of eligible recipients for their faculty, and may decide to exclude any students that have a misconduct finding against them or for any other reason they see necessary. Where a student is excluded for reasons other than misconduct, the reason for the exclusion must be reported to Academic Senate. (16) The executive dean (or delegate) will affirm one recipient who meets the criteria and has the highest mark for their thesis or dissertation for the faculty and advise the Student Administration and Academic Senate of the results. (17) Each year, the Office of Governance and Corporate Affairs will invite faculties to identify anyone who has graduated or will graduate in the relevant calendar year and meets the eligibility criteria for the Higher Degree by Research University Medal. (18) Eligibility criteria and application guidelines for the Higher Degree by Research University Medal will be set by the University Research Committee and reviewed every two years. (19) Each faculty, coordinated by the sub dean (graduate studies), will review the list and submit their nominations for the Higher Degree by Research University Medal to the University Research Committee. A faculty is not required to make a nomination if there are no eligible graduands for the faculty. (20) The University Research Committee will review the nominations and recommend one master’s graduand and one doctoral graduand per faculty for the relevant calendar year. The University Research Committee is not required to make a recommendation if there are no suitable nominees for a faculty. (21) Where there is no reasonable or fair way to determine between two or more candidates from the same faculty, the University Research Committee may recommend more than one of the relevant medals for the faculty in the relevant calendar year. (22) The Deputy Vice-Chancellor (Research) affirms the medal recipients and advises the Student Administration and Academic Senate of the results. (23) The Student Administration will be notified of all University and Charles Sturt Medal winners and: (24) University Medals and the Charles Sturt Medal will be inscribed with the: (25) University Medals and the Charles Sturt Medal will be presented at graduation ceremonies as stated in the Medals and Executive Dean's Awards Policy. (26) Recipients of a Higher Degree by Research, Bachelor (Honours) or the Charles Sturt Medal who have already graduated will be invited to receive their medal at a graduation ceremony as agreed between the recipient and the University within 12 months following the receipt of notice of award or may elect to receive the medal in absentia. (27) Where an alternate ceremony has been nominated, this cannot be changed except with the approval of the Manager, Graduations & Protocol. (28) Any medals not presented at graduation ceremonies will be issued in absentia as determined by the Student Administration. (29) For Executive Dean's Awards, the faculty operations teams will generate a report to identify students who meet the eligibility criteria. (30) For the purpose of calculating eligibility for Executive Dean’s Awards: (31) A student can meet the eligibility for an Executive Dean’s Award more than once in an academic year. (32) The executive dean or their delegate will review and approve the award recipients. In doing so, the executive dean may consider any misconduct findings against the student during the session(s) they were enrolled in the subjects contributing to the award eligibility. (33) The faculty operations team will: (34) The Executive Dean’s Award certificate will include: (35) Nil.Medals and Executive Dean's Awards Procedure
Section 1 - Purpose
Scope
References
Section 2 - Glossary
Section 3 - Policy
Section 4 - Procedure
Part A - Medals
The Charles Sturt Medal
Undergraduate and Postgraduate University Medals
Bachelor (Honours) University Medals
Higher Degree by Research University Medal
Presentation of medals
Part B - Executive Dean’s Awards
Section 5 - Guidelines
View Current
This is not a current document. To view current or future versions, click the link in the document's navigation bar.
‘This is to certify that [student's full name], enrolled in the [course name], received an Executive Dean’s Award in [session/year] in recognition of outstanding academic performance.’
Top of Page