(1) This procedure outlines the University's crisis management model and arrangements for responding to incidents in accordance with the Resilience Policy. (2) The procedure describes: (3) This procedure applies to all: (4) Refer to the Resilience Policy. (5) This procedure is subordinate to the Resilience Policy, as shown in the following hierarchy: (6) The Crisis Management Plan provides the practical information for the execution of effective crisis management, and in particular, the information required to effectively run the crisis management team and operational response teams. (7) The University follows a three-tiered crisis management model: (8) This simple and adaptable model can be tailored to a range of simple and complex scenarios, and is defined by the following key principles: (9) Four general phases will occur following an emergency event requiring a crisis response. They may occur in sequence with overlap, as above, or simultaneously, especially in the case of multiple events. (10) Following stabilisation of the situation and management of the crisis phase, the CMT will seek to: (11) All incidents, following the initial emergency response in accordance with applicable plans, reported through the University's incident reporting processes are assessed by an incident assessment team and classified according to severity. This classification determines which tier of the crisis management model is required: (12) The University’s incident reporting procedures ensure key incidents are reported through to Executive Director, Safety, Security and Wellbeing, the Director, Security and Resilience (CSO) and/or the Director, Risk and Compliance. These can occur through multiple means. Upon notification, the informed officer will activate the incident assessment team. (13) The incident assessment team (IAT) is a small, qualified team that assesses and classifies the incident. It consists of: (14) This team assesses the incident using the incident severity tool contained in the Crisis Management Plan. (15) Once the incident is classified, the IAT briefs the relevant senior executive leader and/or SET and the appropriate tier response is activated (see table at clause 11). (16) Notwithstanding the IAT assessment and classification, any senior executive leader may activate a CMT at any time. (17) Incidents will be classified according to the following table, supported by an incident assessment: (18) Operational response teams (ORTs) include the emergency control organisation under the Emergency Management Procedure, as well as teams identified in business continuity plans or ad hoc teams as determined by the senior executive leader or CMT. (19) In a Level 1 response, ORTs report through their line reporting. In Level 2 and 3 responses, they are subordinated directly to the CMT. (20) ORTs have the following responsibilities: (21) The crisis management team (CMT) consists of the appointed leader and a task-organised team from across the University, in accordance with the Crisis Management Plan. It is facilitated by the Director, Security and Resilience (CSO). (22) The CMT will: (23) The senior executive team (SET) consists of members stated at the ‘Senior executive team (SET) roles and management’ heading below. (24) The SET will: (25) The SET consists of the: (26) When the SET meets it is joined by the below as required: (27) A secured Microsoft Teams group is in place for the conduct of SET briefings. Should Microsoft Teams be unavailable, a suitable alternative will be set up by the CMT. (28) Briefings will include: (29) Further details related to the briefings, including templates and considerations, are included in the Crisis Management Plan. (30) External communications are managed as follows: (31) External public communication will only occur with the approval of the Vice-Chancellor's office, through the Chief of Staff, even in situations where the CMT is activated. This is with the exception of Level 0 incidents when communication channels including campus alerts will be issued directly by the operational response teams involved. (32) The crisis management model described above will also be employed by the University in instances involving partners. It is understood that in these instances the University’s and the partner’s crisis management processes will be required to run in parallel. (33) This will be coordinated by the placement of suitable liaison staff (e.g. partnership managers) onto the CMT and equivalent groups within partner organisations. In some instances, it may be appropriate, if agreed between the University and the partner, to run a combined CMT. (34) An after-incident review will be conducted following all Level 2 and Level 3 incidents. Details for the conduct are in the Crisis Management Plan. (35) This procedure will be reviewed annually and following any significant recommendations as a result of an after-incident review. (36) The University’s crisis management model will be tested by an external party no less than once annually to Level 3 to ensure effectiveness. (37) Level 2 and Level 3 incidents will be reported to Audit and Risk Committee in the quarterly Division of Safety, Security and Wellbeing report, along with results from tests. (38) This procedure is supported by: (39) Nil.Crisis Management Procedure
Section 1 - Purpose
Scope
Top of PageSection 2 - Policy
Section 3 - Procedures
Part A - Crisis management model
Oversight
University Council maintains oversight and governance, ensures effective plans, supports the Vice-Chancellor with strategic guidance and empowers their decision-making.
Level 3 – Strategic response
Senior executive team (SET)
Level 2 – Tactical response
Crisis management team (CMT)
Level 1 -Operational response
Operational response teams (ORT)
Crisis management sequence and transition
Part B - Incident classification and management
Emergency/incident/threat
Incident assessment team
Lvl 1
Brief to applicable senior executive
Lvl 2
Brief to applicable senior executive
Lvl 3
Brief to senior executive team
Incident assessment and classification
Example: fire alarm evacuation with no fire.
Example: minor fire with no injuries, no damage causing significant operational effects, evacuation etc. effective, no media coverage
Example: significant fire resulting in minor injuries and damage to a significant amount of equipment, with some media exposure
Example: significant fire affecting multiple buildings, causing significant injuries, significantly disrupting University operations and gaining considerable media coverage
Part C - Crisis management tiers
Tier 1: Operational response – Operational response teams
Tier 2: Tactical response – Crisis management team
Tier 3: Strategic response – Senior executive team
Senior executive team (SET) roles and management
Communications management
Level 0
Level 1
Level 2
Level 3
Partnerships
Review and reporting
Section 4 - Guidelines and other supporting documents
Top of PageSection 5 - Glossary
Section 6 - Document context
View Current
This is the current version of this document. To view historic versions, click the link in the document's navigation bar.
Led by the Vice-Chancellor or appointee
Provides strategic direction to the University's response
Approves all external public communications
Provides: updates to Council; decisions to tiers 2 and 3
Receives: guidance from Council
Leader appointed by senior executive
Responds to incidents affecting multiple areas
May convene specialist teams for legal advice, communications, etc.
Provides: updates to tier 1; decisions to tier 3
Receives: decisions from tier 1
Led by business as usual (BAU) leader (for normal business units) or person appointed by the CMT (when task organised)
Activated in accordance with emergency plans, business continuity plans and/or as directed by the CMT
Provides: updates to tiers 1 and 2
Receives: directions from tiers 1 and 2
Tier 1 response required:
ORTs convened
Tier 2 tactical response:
CMT and ORTs convened
Tier 3 strategic response:
SET, CMT and ORTs convened
Level 0 – Adverse event
Business as usual (BAU)
Low risk
Routine business activities
Minor issues with minimal impact
Low complexity
Standard operating procedures apply
Can be managed within BAU structure
Line reporting is sufficient
No significant impact on operations
Managed internally in accordance with BAU structures line reporting
Level 1 - incident
Operational response teams (ORT)
Moderate risk
Potential for operational disruption but manageable
Some impact on normal activities
Low complexity
Requires some coordination among teams
Managed within internal emergency/incident structures line and IAT reporting
Business continuity/incident plans enacted
Level 2 – Critical incident
Crisis Management Team (CMT)
High risk
Significant potential for disruption
Requires immediate attention and intervention
Moderate complexity, potentially affecting partnerships
Significant, rapid coordination required across multiple sections of the University
CMT activated with ORT’s subordinated and directed by the CMT
CMT reporting to senior executive (portfolio leader)
Level 3 - Crisis
Senior executive team (SET)
High risk
Critical situation impacting the entire organisation
Potential for severe reputational damage
High complexity, potentially affecting multiple partnerships
Requires the highest level of organisational response
Intensive communication and coordination efforts across the organisation
CMT active and subordinated to SET
SET guiding the organisational response, approving plans for execution by the CMT, and briefing University Council
Note: In the event of an emergency, emergency response teams may already be activated and managing the incident under the Emergency Management Procedure and emergency plans.
IAW BAU structures – no public communication with the exception of campus alerts.
Contacts Media Manager if contacted by media
Head, Communications and Government Relations determines point of communication handover back to BAU owner and support to finalise
Head, Communications and Government Relations
Chief of Staff directs all communication with support of Head, Communications and Government Relations to execute
Compliance drivers
N/A
Review requirements
Annual review
Document class
Governance