(1) The title of Distinguished Professor is conferred to formally recognise staff who have achieved national and international recognition for their outstanding contributions to research and scholarship, and who continue to elevate the academic standing and profile of Charles Sturt University (the University). The Distinguished Professor title may also be approved as part of recruitment efforts to attract eminent and exceptional individuals in areas of strategic significance to the University. (2) This procedure sets out the eligibility criteria, appointment processes and terms of appointment as a Charles Sturt University Distinguished Professor. (3) This procedure: (4) This procedure supports the Appointments Policy and Academic Promotion Policy. (5) The Charles Sturt University Distinguished Professor is a highly prestigious appointment to attract and retain eminent professors renowned for their exceptional scholarly achievements and international leadership in research, teaching, engagement, and innovation. These appointments align with the strategic objectives of the University and contribute to enhancing its reputation as a nationally and globally recognised research institution. (6) A nominee’s whole career will be considered, however special attention will be given to the nominee’s achievements within the past five years, together with opportunities for the future contributions to the University as aligned to the University Research Strategy. (7) There is no limit on the number of Charles Sturt University Distinguished Professors that the University may appoint, but the number awarded will reflect the fact that this is a highly prestigious title. (8) To be eligible for consideration as a distinguished professor, a nominee must: (9) Those not eligible for consideration as a distinguished professor are: (10) Nominations for Charles Sturt University Distinguished Professor will be considered with reference to the following criteria (submitted using the Distinguished Professor nomination form): (11) Nominations for Charles Sturt University Distinguished Professor may be: (12) The Distinguished Professor Promotion Committee (the committee) will review each nomination and determine that the evidence provided meets the criteria as set in clause 8 - 10. (13) The committee may ask for additional information on any nominee and seek benchmarking data on performance relative to disciplinary or professional norms. (14) The committee may at its discretion decide to interview the applicant. (15) The committee may nominate and seek reports from referees who are respected international leaders in the field or gather any other information as is deemed necessary for assessing applications. (16) On recommendation of the committee, the Vice-Chancellor has the authority to approve the candidate to be offered appointment as a Charles Sturt Distinguished Professor. (17) The Deputy Vice-Chancellor and Vice-President (Research) convenes the committee, ensuring, as far as practicable, 40:40:20 gender representation. (18) The committee will constitute: (19) A committee member may not vote where the committee is considering the application of a staff member for whom they are the immediate supervisor. (20) The quorum of the committee is five voting members. (21) Nominees receive written notification of the outcome and, where successful, an offer of appointment as Charles Sturt University Distinguished Professor. For internal nominees, copies of the offer are provided to the applicant’s supervisor. (22) If the nominee accepts the appointment, this will be communicated to University staff and reported to the University Council. (23) Unsuccessful nominees will be advised of the outcome by the Deputy Vice-Chancellor and Vice-President (Research) with feedback on their unsuccessful nomination. The feedback may address any gaps in the evidence, strengths of the application, areas for improvement and advice on future activities that might be undertaken to strengthen the nomination. (24) Unsuccessful applicants can not apply for a Distinguished Professorship in the following calendar year unless they have written permission from the Deputy Vice-Chancellor and Vice-President (Research) to do so. (25) An unsuccessful internal applicant may ask for a review of a decision if there is evidence of a breach of this procedure which has been a significant factor in the decision not to promote the applicant. Review requests must be submitted to the Vice-Chancellor for consideration. (26) To be considered, the request for a review must be submitted to the Vice-Chancellor within 20 business days from the date of notification of decision. (27) The Vice-Chancellor may decline to progress a review that they consider does not meet the grounds for review. (28) Where the Vice-Chancellor upholds the grounds for a review, they will refer the outcome to the Deputy Vice-Chancellor and Vice-President (Research) to convene the Distinguished Professor Promotion Committee (the committee) to consider the promotion application afresh. (29) The committee will be convened with additional members from the membership of the committee that made the original recommendation. (30) After the committee has considered the promotion application, the chair will advise the Vice-Chancellor of the committee’s decision and the reasons for it. (31) The further decision of the committee will be final. There will be no further review of the decision within the University. (32) The Vice-Chancellor will advise the applicant of the decision as soon as possible. (33) Appointments as a Charles Sturt University Distinguished Professor are made on the following terms: (34) Nil. (35) Nil.Distinguished Professor Procedure
Section 1 - Purpose
Scope
Top of PageSection 2 - Policy
Section 3 - Procedure
Eligibility and criteria for appointment
Nomination process
Assessment and decision process
Distinguished Professor Promotion Committee membership and quorum
Communication of outcomes
Review of decisions
Terms of appointment
Top of PageSection 4 - Guidelines
Section 5 - Glossary
View Current
This is the current version of this document. To view historic versions, click the link in the document's navigation bar.
Criteria
Example evidence
An international reputation for exceptional research and scholarship
Professional peer recognition of significant achievements at a state, national and international level
Research/research team leadership
Outstanding community engagement and service
Potential for ongoing excellence