(1) As approved by the Board of Governors on 1 May 1991 (BG 91/44). (2) Nil. (3) It is the University policy that there are regular reviews of Faculties and their constituent parts. Such reviews should: (4) Faculties will normally be reviewed at intervals of about five years. However, although less than five years may have passed since the last review the Vice-Chancellor may decide that a review take place when: (5) The Vice-Chancellor may, where circumstances warrant: (6) When a review has been announced, the Faculty Board may raise issues relevant to the review and suggest persons for appointment to the review. (7) The Faculty Board shall present to the Vice-Chancellor a comprehensive report addressing the terms of reference specific to the review. (8) The Academic Senate may present to the Vice-Chancellor a report addressing the terms of reference specific to the review. (9) After taking advice, the Vice-Chancellor shall appoint a review committee. A review committee shall normally comprise: (10) Where only part of a Faculty is subject to review the Vice-Chancellor may appoint the Dean of the Faculty as a member of the review committee. (11) The composition of the review committee shall be consistent with equal employment opportunity principles. (12) The terms of reference for each review shall be determined by the Vice-Chancellor. The following matters should normally be addressed. (13) The review will assess the Faculty's current success and future capability in meeting the aims and objectives expressed in the Faculty's development plan. In addressing these matters, the review committee, in the context of the Faculty's human, physical and financial resources, should normally assess the following: (14) The Vice-Chancellor may also include in the terms of reference a requirement to assess and report on the performance of the Faculty. (15) A review committee shall consider: (16) The review committee shall consult as widely as it deems appropriate both within the the University and outside including a call for written submissions. The present or retiring Dean of the Faculty subject to review shall be afforded the opportunity to make a submission, verbally or in writing or both, to the review committee. Any officer of the the University may be asked to provide relevant information to the review committee. (17) The review committee shall normally present an interim report to the Vice-Chancellor with any minority or dissenting report thereof. The Vice-Chancellor shall normally refer such an interim report for comments to the Faculty concerned and to such other persons, committees or bodies such as the Academic Senate as he or she deems appropriate. Any comments proffered shall be referred by the Vice-Chancellor to the review committee for consideration prior to submitting the final report. (18) The Vice-Chancellor shall refer the final report to the Academic Senate for comment, and thereafter the Vice-Chancellor may refer the report to the Council with recommendations to the Council for decision. (19) Nil.Academic (Faculty) Review Policy
Section 1 - Purpose
Section 2 - Glossary
Section 3 - Policy
Top of PageSection 4 - Procedures
Part A - Timetable for Reviews
Part B - Advice from the Faculty
Part C - Advice from the Academic Senate
Part D - Membership of Review Committees
Part E - Terms of Reference
Part F - Review Process, Report and Implementation
Section 5 - Guidelines
View Current
This is not a current document. It has been repealed and is no longer in force.