Status and Details

Status and Details

Vice-Chancellor's Award Guidelines - Professional Excellence

Show Field Notes
Status Historic Indicates if this version of the document is in effect (Current), yet to come into effect (Future), or expired (Historic).
Effective Date 22nd May 2014 This is the date on which this version of the document came into effect.
Review Date 30th April 2015 The next review of this document is scheduled to commence on this date.
Approval Authority Executive Director, Human Resources The noted authority approved this is version of the document.
Approval Date 28th April 2014 This is the date on which this version of the document was approved by the authorised authority.
Expiry Date 23rd May 2018 This is the date on which this version expires. It may still apply, conditionally, after this date.
Unit Head Adam Browne
Executive Director, Human Resources
This is the officer generally responsible for day to day administrative matters.
Author Karen Lenihan

This is the author of record for this version of the document.
Enquiries Contact General enquiries should be directed to the officer/area listed.

Summary of Changes from Previous Version

23 May 2018 – Vice-Chancellor’s Award Guidelines expired due to being replaced by the CSU Excellence Awards Guidelines.

This is the first version of this document to be published in the CSU Policy Library. For all intents and purposes, this version is reflective of the existing version that was published in the relevant manual (academic or administration) at the time the CSU Policy Library was launched. The document has been subjected to reformatting, including the application of a new numbering system and title.

The following information details the history of changes to the document prior to its publication via the CSU Policy Library:

4/3/2009 - Sub-clause 3.4a - ratings for team members expanded.

3.4b added - at least one team member to have completed 2 or more years’ service at CSU.

2/11/2010 - Remove requirement to achieve specific outcomes in the Performance Management Scheme for eligibility for nominations.

Clarify nomination and selection process and minor edits to format.

24/2/2011 - Removed all reference to “outstanding” from selection criteria and throughout document and replaced with reference to “excellence”.

Minor edits to phrasing and format of guidelines and nomination form.

Updated objectives, eligibility criteria, selection criteria and nominations.

Nomination form included as an appendix.

3/8/2012 - Dean replaced by Executive Dean.

29/5/2013 - Award values

25/2/2014 - 3 - Monetary value of award deleted. Appendix - email address and submission date changed.