Document Feedback - Review and Comment
Step 1 of 4: Comment on Document
How to make a comment?
1. Use this to open a comment box for your chosen Section, Part, Heading or clause.
2. Type your feedback into the comments box and then click "save comment" button located in the lower-right of the comment box.
3. Do not open more than one comment box at the same time.
4. When you have finished making comments proceed to the next stage by clicking on the "Continue to Step 2" button at the very bottom of this page.
Important Information
During the comment process you are connected to a database. Like internet banking, the session that connects you to the database may time-out due to inactivity. If you do not have JavaScript running you will recieve a message to advise you of the length of time before the time-out. If you have JavaScript enabled, the time-out is lengthy and should not cause difficulty, however you should note the following tips to avoid losing your comments or corrupting your entries:
-
DO NOT jump between web pages/applications while logging comments.
-
DO NOT log comments for more than one document at a time. Complete and submit all comments for one document before commenting on another.
-
DO NOT leave your submission half way through. If you need to take a break, submit your current set of comments. The system will email you a copy of your comments so you can identify where you were up to and add to them later.
-
DO NOT exit from the interface until you have completed all three stages of the submission process.
(1) This procedure outlines the University's crisis management model and arrangements for responding to incidents in accordance with the Resilience Policy. (3) This procedure applies to all: (4) Refer to the Resilience Policy. (5) This procedure is subordinate to the Resilience Policy, as shown in the following hierarchy: (6) The Crisis Management Plan provides the practical information for the execution of effective crisis management, and in particular, the information required to effectively run the crisis management team and operational response teams. (7) The University follows a three-tiered crisis management model: (8) This simple and adaptable model can be tailored to a range of simple and complex scenarios, and is defined by the following key principles: (9) Four general phases will occur following an emergency event requiring a crisis response. They may occur in sequence with overlap, as above, or simultaneously, especially in the case of multiple events. (10) Following stabilisation of the situation and management of the crisis phase, the CMT will seek to: (11) All incidents, following the initial emergency response in accordance with applicable plans, reported through the University's incident reporting processes are assessed by an incident assessment team and classified according to severity. This classification determines which tier of the crisis management model is required: (12) The University’s incident reporting procedures ensure key incidents are reported through to Executive Director, Safety, Security and Wellbeing, the Director, Security and Resilience (CSO) and/or the Director, Risk and Compliance. These can occur through multiple means. Upon notification, the informed officer will activate the incident assessment team. (13) The incident assessment team (IAT) is a small, qualified team that assesses and classifies the incident. It consists of: (14) This team assesses the incident using the incident severity tool contained in the Crisis Management Plan. (15) Once the incident is classified, the IAT briefs the relevant senior executive leader and/or SET and the appropriate tier response is activated (see table at clause 11). (16) Notwithstanding the IAT assessment and classification, any senior executive leader may activate a CMT at any time. (17) Incidents will be classified according to the following table, supported by an incident assessment: (18) Operational response teams (ORTs) include the emergency control organisation under the Emergency Management Procedure, as well as teams identified in business continuity plans or ad hoc teams as determined by the senior executive leader or CMT. (19) In a Level 1 response, ORTs report through their line reporting. In Level 2 and 3 responses, they are subordinated directly to the CMT. (20) ORTs have the following responsibilities: (21) The crisis management team (CMT) consists of the appointed leader and a task-organised team from across the University, in accordance with the Crisis Management Plan. It is facilitated by the Director, Security and Resilience (CSO). (23) The senior executive team (SET) consists of members stated at the ‘Senior executive team (SET) roles and management’ heading below. (26) When the SET meets it is joined by the below as required: (27) A secured Microsoft Teams group is in place for the conduct of SET briefings. Should Microsoft Teams be unavailable, a suitable alternative will be set up by the CMT. (29) Further details related to the briefings, including templates and considerations, are included in the Crisis Management Plan. (30) External communications are managed as follows: (31) External public communication will only occur with the approval of the Vice-Chancellor's office, through the Chief of Staff, even in situations where the CMT is activated. This is with the exception of Level 0 incidents when communication channels including campus alerts will be issued directly by the operational response teams involved. (32) The crisis management model described above will also be employed by the University in instances involving partners. It is understood that in these instances the University’s and the partner’s crisis management processes will be required to run in parallel. (33) This will be coordinated by the placement of suitable liaison staff (e.g. partnership managers) onto the CMT and equivalent groups within partner organisations. In some instances, it may be appropriate, if agreed between the University and the partner, to run a combined CMT. (34) An after-incident review will be conducted following all Level 2 and Level 3 incidents. Details for the conduct are in the Crisis Management Plan. (35) This procedure will be reviewed annually and following any significant recommendations as a result of an after-incident review. (36) The University’s crisis management model will be tested by an external party no less than once annually to Level 3 to ensure effectiveness. (37) Level 2 and Level 3 incidents will be reported to Audit and Risk Committee in the quarterly Division of Safety, Security and Wellbeing report, along with results from tests. (38) This procedure is supported by:Crisis Management Procedure
Section 1 - Purpose
Scope
Top of PageSection 2 - Policy
Section 3 - Procedures
Part A - Crisis management model
Oversight
University Council maintains oversight and governance, ensures effective plans, supports the Vice-Chancellor with strategic guidance and empowers their decision-making.
Level 3 – Strategic response
Senior executive team (SET)
Level 2 – Tactical response
Crisis management team (CMT)
Level 1 -Operational response
Operational response teams (ORT)
Crisis management sequence and transition
Part B - Incident classification and management
Emergency/incident/threat
Incident assessment team
Lvl 1
Brief to applicable senior executive
Lvl 2
Brief to applicable senior executive
Lvl 3
Brief to senior executive team
Incident assessment and classification
Example: fire alarm evacuation with no fire.
Example: minor fire with no injuries, no damage causing significant operational effects, evacuation etc. effective, no media coverage
Example: significant fire resulting in minor injuries and damage to a significant amount of equipment, with some media exposure
Example: significant fire affecting multiple buildings, causing significant injuries, significantly disrupting University operations and gaining considerable media coverage
Part C - Crisis management tiers
Tier 1: Operational response – Operational response teams
Tier 2: Tactical response – Crisis management team
Tier 3: Strategic response – Senior executive team
Senior executive team (SET) roles and management
Communications management
Level 0
Level 1
Level 2
Level 3
Partnerships
Review and reporting
Section 4 - Guidelines and other supporting documents
Top of PageSection 5 - Glossary
Top of PageSection 6 - Document context