Document Feedback - Review and Comment
Step 1 of 4: Comment on Document
How to make a comment?
1. Use this to open a comment box for your chosen Section, Part, Heading or clause.
2. Type your feedback into the comments box and then click "save comment" button located in the lower-right of the comment box.
3. Do not open more than one comment box at the same time.
4. When you have finished making comments proceed to the next stage by clicking on the "Continue to Step 2" button at the very bottom of this page.
Important Information
During the comment process you are connected to a database. Like internet banking, the session that connects you to the database may time-out due to inactivity. If you do not have JavaScript running you will recieve a message to advise you of the length of time before the time-out. If you have JavaScript enabled, the time-out is lengthy and should not cause difficulty, however you should note the following tips to avoid losing your comments or corrupting your entries:
-
DO NOT jump between web pages/applications while logging comments.
-
DO NOT log comments for more than one document at a time. Complete and submit all comments for one document before commenting on another.
-
DO NOT leave your submission half way through. If you need to take a break, submit your current set of comments. The system will email you a copy of your comments so you can identify where you were up to and add to them later.
-
DO NOT exit from the interface until you have completed all three stages of the submission process.
(1) This procedure sets out the processes used to monitor, measure and evaluate the work health and safety (WHS) management system at Charles Sturt University (the University). (2) This procedure has the same scope as the Health, Safety and Wellbeing Policy. (3) See the Health, Safety and Wellbeing Policy. (4) A range of processes, completed at different organisational levels, support the University's WHS management system. These are set out in detail in Parts B-E of this procedure and summarised in the following table. (5) Workplace inspections identify, assess and eliminate or control hazards in the workplace. Regular inspections that are carried out diligently and identify and eliminate or control risks lead to higher standards of workplace health and safety and are the key to the prevention of incidents and improved workplace safety culture. (6) An important element of successfully implementing work health and safety workplace inspections involves meaningful and effective communication with workers aimed at achieving commitment from all areas and levels within each organisational unit. Managers/supervisors need to plan for how consultation will be achieved and how ideas and actions will be communicated. (7) For assistance or guidance on work health and safety consultation at the University, refer to the Health, Safety and Wellbeing website. (8) All persons in charge of workplaces must ensure that WHS inspections of their workplaces are completed and appropriate controls are implemented. Records of all hazards identified and actions undertaken to rectify or control those hazards must be kept. (9) When organising workplace inspections: (10) Managers/supervisors should enlist the aid of their employees (with knowledge or expertise in the particular areas where relevant) to assist in the conduct of inspections. The number of persons needed to carry out an inspection is generally limited to about three persons. However, the task should be rotated to involve as many employees as possible in the workplace inspection program. (11) Health and safety representatives (HSRs) have a legal right to inspect workplaces and may schedule this activity. Managers/supervisors should keep in contact with their HSR and may find it beneficial to conduct inspections with them. (12) Health, Safety and Wellbeing will provide relevant workplace inspection checklists on their website. These can be used to form the basis of workplace inspection records. (13) Workplace inspections are intended to detect hazards and should not be unduly critical or concerned with insignificant details. The approach of the inspection team should be to determine that everything is satisfactory rather than to determine how many things are wrong. The Health, Safety and Wellbeing website provides further information on the completion of workplace inspections. (14) When the workplace inspection is completed, all unsatisfactory items recorded on the checklist (i.e. the hazards identified) must be addressed by raising a work order with Facilities Management or other appropriate action. (15) Information from workplace inspection action sheets will be used to inform WHS annual management plans and reviews. (16) Organisational units must make adequate resources available to manage WHS and to action any issues. These resources may be financial, physical (e.g. facilities and equipment) and/or human. (17) Each organisational unit must produce an annual WHS management plan within the first quarter of the year. (18) Information in the WHS management plan should include: (19) The WHS management plan must be: (20) Actions against the plans should be monitored throughout the year. Plans will be reviewed and acquittals completed annually in due diligence reporting. (21) The University’s WHS management systems are audited to evaluate their effectiveness and facilitate continual improvement. This includes evaluating: (22) WHS audits may be internal or external: (23) The Manager, Health Safety and Wellbeing will: (24) WHS audit schedules will be based on risk (hazard profile, incidents, previous audit results and workplace inspection results). (25) The outcomes of the WHS system audits, including levels of compliance/non-compliance and any corrective actions required, will be reported to the USHMC and Audit and Risk Committee. Corrective actions may be included in the University's enterprise action register. (26) All aspects of the WHS management system are reviewed at planned intervals to ensure its continuing suitability, adequacy and effectiveness. (27) The Executive Leadership Team is responsible for the University WHS management system review. (28) Heads of faculty/division/office are responsible for their organisational unit’s WHS management system review(s). (29) Each faculty/division/office executive leader will ensure their organisational unit’s WHS management system is reviewed, following advice from the Division of Safety, Security and Wellbeing. (30) Reviews must be documented and plans developed to implement improvements where gaps are identified. A copy of reviews and associated plans must be sent to Health, Safety and Wellbeing. (31) Faculty/division/office leadership teams must monitor open actions and ensure these are completed and the actions closed. (32) Health, Safety and Wellbeing will: (34) This procedure uses terms defined in the Health, Safety and Wellbeing Policy, as well as the following:Health, Safety and Wellbeing Procedure - Inspections, Plans, Audits and Reviews
Section 1 - Purpose
Scope
Section 2 - Policy
Section 3 - Procedures
Part A - Overview
Part B - Workplace inspections
Consultation with workers
Conduct of workplace inspections
Part C - Annual WHS management plan and review
WHS management plans
Part D - WHS audits
General audit arrangements
WHS system audits
Part E - WHS management system review
Faculty/division/office WHS management systems
Continuous WHS management system reviews
Top of PageSection 4 - Guidelines
Top of PageSection 5 - Glossary